When Fb CEO Mark Zuckerberg testified earlier than the U.S. Senate on Capitol Hill yesterday, he refuted the claims of former Fb product supervisor turned whistleblower Francis Haugen. In his testimony, Haugen described the corporate as “morally bankrupt” and mentioned that it intentionally focused kids underneath 13 years previous. She additionally gave recommendation on tips on how to monitor the corporate and informed the senator. “The truth that Fb is so afraid of even primary transparency that it goes out of its approach to block researchers who ask embarrassing questions exhibits the necessity for congressional oversight.”
- Table of Contents
Senator Ed Markey mentioned Congress can be taking motion. “Fb is like Massive Tobacco, engaging younger children with that first cigarette,” mentioned Markey, including: “We won’t enable your organization to hurt our kids and out households and our democracy any longer.”
In response, Zuckerberg shared in a Fb publish a observe he had written to all staff. With out referring to Haugen by title – he merely referenced “as we speak’s testimony” – Zuckerberg mentioned the corporate cared deeply about points like security, well-being and psychological well being and wrote: “It is tough to see protection that misrepresents our work and our motives. On the most simple degree, I believe most of us simply do not acknowledge the false image of the corporate that’s being painted.”
He mentioned lots of the claims do not make any sense, and wrote: “On the coronary heart of those accusations is this concept that we prioritize revenue over security and well-being. That is simply not true.”
He reiterated earlier claims that Fb’s personal analysis into how Instagram impacts younger individuals had been mischaracterised, writing: “We have now an industry-leading analysis program in order that we are able to determine necessary points and work on them. It is disheartening to see that work taken out of context and used to assemble a false narrative that we do not care,” He additionally mentioned he would welcome up to date web laws, writing: “at some degree the correct physique to evaluate tradeoffs between social equities is our democratically elected Congress.”
One reply to the publish from Akemi Sue Fisher mentioned, in capital letters: “Can we get this publish truth checked please??”
Zuckerberg’s publish additionally referred to Monday’s outage, as he claimed misplaced revenues weren’t the difficulty. “The deeper concern with an outage like this is not how many individuals change to aggressive providers or how a lot cash we lose, however what it means for the individuals who depend on our providers to speak with family members, run their companies, or assist their communities,” he wrote.
Regardless of Zuckerberg’s protestations, some type of regulatory motion towards Fb now appears extra potential than ever. If the CEO goes to hold on referring to “the testimony” he might need to make clear which one.