What is In-App Bidding and how it benefits your marketing

What is In-App Bidding and how it benefits your marketing

How precisely does in-app bidding work? Why has it turn into such a giant deal? Is it higher than the “outdated strategies” of advert monetization?

Table of Contents

I’ve the solutions to all these questions and extra.

On this information, I’ll take a deep dive into this methodology of programmatic promoting. I’ll go over all the things it is advisable to learn about in-app bidding – its advantages, greatest practices, the way it compares to the waterfall mannequin, one of the best options available on the market, and so forth.

Let’s get began.


Programmatic Promoting and In-App Bidding 

During the last couple of years, the world of cellular app monetization and promoting has modified fairly a bit.

One of many greatest tech accomplishments of the app&sport trade is programmatic promoting.

Merely mentioned, programmatic promoting is an automatic method to promote and purchase advert stock.

That is truly an umbrella time period.

It contains the 2 hottest strategies for getting and promoting adverts – the waterfall mannequin and in-app bidding.

How in style is programmatic promoting?

In keeping with PubMatic, at this time, 66% of in-app budgets go into programmatic or open change, whereas solely 34% go into direct shopping for.

What does this imply for app publishers? On prime of different issues – extra alternatives to seize a few of all that cash going into in-app promoting.

What Is In-App Bidding? 

Each good information begins with a definition, so let’s begin this one by defining in-app bidding.

In-app bidding is a programmatic promoting mannequin that features two sides: app publishers and advertisers.

In it, app publishers promote their advert stock in a unified public sale, and advertisers bid towards one another in real-time.

From the writer’s perspective, what makes this mannequin particular is that they’ll supply stock to all demand sources without delay.

From the advertisers’ perspective, they get a good probability to compete on advert stock on the similar time. With another strategies, they’d solely acquire entry to a restricted proportion of stock.

The Historical past of In-App Bidding 

In case you actually need to perceive in-app bidding, it is advisable to perceive its origins.

You’ve most likely heard concerning the time period “in-app header bidding”.

If that is so, you’re most likely questioning – what’s the distinction between this time period and in-app bidding?

There isn’t any distinction.

It’s only a matter of wording and, properly, historical past.


Header Bidding on Desktop 

The phrase “in-app header bidding” comes from the preliminary thought behind in-app bidding.

The factor is, earlier than this kind of bidding got here to the world of cellular, a comparable mannequin existed on the net.

On desktops, header bidding got here to life in 2015. As quickly because it appeared, it rocked the present desktop promoting world.

The factor is, on the time, advertisers bought bored with waterfall bidding and Google’s public sale guidelines. Because of this, they began on the lookout for options.

Nevertheless, header bidding turned out to be rather more than simply an alternate.

Right here’s the way it works.

On this mannequin, the online publishers public sale stock of their net web page headers in real-time.

For this goal, they add a wrapper to their web sites’ headers.

This permits advertisers to concurrently compete for a spot at a header of an internet web page. Whoever wins the public sale, their code will get integrated into the header.

On account of this methodology, publishers began getting the very best doable worth for every impression. The truth is, in response to Fyber, due to this mannequin, net publishers have seen as much as 40% increased eCPMs.

Alternatively, the profit for advertisers was fairly apparent – they bought to the highest of the web page.


In-App Header Bidding

Whereas all this was taking place on the net, the app world caught with the “good outdated” waterfall bidding mannequin.

Nonetheless, app publishers and advertisers additionally began craving one thing like header bidding.

The issue? There are no headers in cellular apps.

Because of this, it was more difficult to develop options for-in app header bidding. Fortunately, within the final couple of years, totally practical in-app bidding options appeared.

As a substitute of counting on headers, in-app header bidding works with an SDK integration that generates advert requests for an app.

The advert requests take part in an public sale within the cloud with server-side demand companions. As soon as there’s a successful bid, the in-app bidding platform sends out a response to the consumer SDK.

As you possibly can see, this course of is all the things however easy. No marvel it was so tough to develop.

In-App Bidding vs. Waterfall Bidding

There isn’t any speaking about in-app bidding with out speaking about waterfall bidding.

We will have a look at it as a new vs. conventional relationship.

On this relationship, waterfall bidding is the older, conventional approach, whereas in-app bidding is new and improved.

Conventional (Waterfall)

The waterfall mannequin has been the customary of advert monetization for the previous decade.

Basically, waterfall bidding works similar to water flowing down a cliff.

Within the waterfall, the advert server calls advert networks in a predetermined order, one after the other. This order relies on historic costs and efficiency. There’s additionally a worth ground – the minimal worth that can be accepted for the location.

Then, the requests for bids go down the “cliff” of bidders till certainly one of them meets the worth ground.

On this course of, it’s not vital how a lot the advertisers are prepared to pay for an impression. As a substitute, historic knowledge has a bonus. In consequence, the mediation platform will give a bonus to the advert networks it has beforehand labored with.

Sounds form of unfair?

That’s precisely what publishers and advertisers don’t like about it.

Within the waterfall mannequin, publishers are doubtlessly leaving cash on the desk. The factor is, they’re counting on the mercy of the primary bidder in line to bid for advert house. Even when somebody on the backside of the listing would bid extra, the writer by no means will get to search out this out.

A whole lot of advertisers discover this mannequin discriminatory. The way in which the waterfall works, not everybody will get a good shot to compete for advert house.

Improved (In-App Bidding)

In-app bidding was created to resolve the problems surrounding waterfall bidding.

This bidding mannequin permits publishers to supply stock to all potential bidders. This additionally contains those that wouldn’t rank excessive within the waterfall.

Whereas the waterfall mannequin prioritizes the primary bidder, in-app bidding provides the benefit to the very best bidder.

Right here, historic knowledge is totally irrelevant.

Within the in-app bidding mannequin, it’s vital what occurs in real-time, not what occurred earlier than. To make this occur, it really works on the idea of a unified public sale.

Within the unified public sale, a number of demand sources acquire entry to the identical advert stock. They bid for it in real-time, and the upper bidder wins. This manner, the costs can go up fairly a bit, leading to increased eCPMs for publishers.

A real unified public sale ought to have these three traits:

  • Being inclusive for all demand sources
  • Concurrently distributing advert requests
  • Permitting everybody to bid in real-time

At coronary heart, unified auctions aren’t a lot totally different from real-life auctions.

Think about a bunch of millionaires auctioning for one thing in a crowded room. On this case, no one cares if somebody is a brand new, self-made millionaire or they arrive from an “outdated cash” household.

Whoever bids most in the intervening time wins the public sale, and that’s all of the knowledge to it.

In-App Bidding + Waterfall Bidding 

Regardless of their variations, there doesn’t must be a versus on this relationship.

In-app bidding and waterfall bidding can work hand in hand. This combine is known as a hybrid setup, and it’s prevalent amongst app and sport publishers. In keeping with Enterprise of Apps, hybrid setups are dominating the market in 2021.

Now, let’s go over how hybrid setups work.

This simplified, 5-step course of ought to provide you with a normal thought:

  1. If an app requests an advert, the request first goes by way of the method of in-app bidding.
  2. The server determines the winner of the public sale (the very best eCPM).
  3. The advert mediation community shortly runs a verify of advert networks within the waterfall mannequin to see if there’s a higher supply (increased eCPM).
  4. If there isn’t any increased bid, the winner advert runs immediately.
  5. If the waterfall accommodates a increased bid, this advert will run first.

Sounds nice, proper?

This sort of resolution permits publishers to get one of the best out of each worlds. With this setup, they need to obtain the very best revenues no matter the place the successful advert comes from.

The one drawback is, from the tech aspect, the hybrid setup is tough to implement. In it, it’s most vital to realize that each of the techniques struggle for an impression concurrently, which is difficult.

Since a lot of the options that assist hybrid setups have appeared over the previous yr, they’re nonetheless comparatively new. Because of this, it’s nonetheless early to inform how properly they work and the way efficient they’re.


Advantages of In-App Bidding 

In-app bidding brings nice advantages for each events within the advert change – publishers and advertisers. Even app customers can really feel its benefits.

First, let’s take at what publishers acquire from in-app bidding.

Greater Demand (and Revenues) 

In an in-app public sale, a number of demand sources bid in open entry, real-time public sale. Because of this, publishers can count on extra demand sources bidding for impressions.

In different phrases, extra competitors amongst advertisers.

This also needs to deliver publishers extra high-paying bidders.

Because the demand and bid density improve, this could end in extra income for the writer. metrics, publishers ought to see elevated eCPMs and ARPDAUs.

Simpler to Preserve 

Usually, waterfall bidding requires extra upkeep than in-app bidding. Some publishers even manually optimize their waterfalls primarily based on operating stories. They analyze historic knowledge and regulate how demand sources rank within the waterfall.

Sounds exhausting?


In contrast to waterfall bidding, in-app bidding isn’t almost as demanding. What issues right here is real-time pricing, not historic knowledge.

On this mannequin, the shopping for/promoting course of is fully automated. This offers publishers extra time to give attention to different vital issues regarding their app.

Elevated Stock Worth

Within the in-app bidding mannequin, premium stock is bought early on to the very best bidders.

Consequently, this makes the remaining stock extra fascinating. In consequence, the costs of the unsold stock ought to improve.

Elevated Fill Charges

It’s vital to replenish as a lot advert house as doable.

The obvious method to improve fill charges is to use a number of advert networks. Every time one advert community fails to fill in advert house, one other one most likely will.

Nevertheless, within the waterfall mannequin, there’s at all times an opportunity that no advert community will meet the set worth ground.

On this case, advert impressions are left unfulfilled.

With in-app bidding, the possibilities of this taking place are a lot decrease.

Because it entails an even bigger competitors, there’s a higher probability a writer can have bids for every advert impression.

Higher UX for Gamers 

One other problem that comes with waterfalls is latency. And, in fact, a poor person expertise that comes together with it.

This is usually a massive turn-off for app customers.

When customers attain a video advert placement that doesn’t load shortly, they could get impatient and exit the app. If this occurs, the advert request doesn’t get stuffed, and the writer earns zero income.

In-app bidding helps publishers with this as properly. The factor is, compared to the waterfall, there are fewer steps within the means of advert serving. Subsequently, adverts can load quicker. With a decreased latency, app customers can take pleasure in a seamless advert expertise.

Extra curious concerning the positives for the advertisers? Coming proper up.

Equal Entry to Premium Stock 

Each advertiser desires of the identical issues – entry to high quality stock and high quality customers at scale.

These are additionally their greatest challenges.

Within the waterfall mannequin, some advertisers will at all times lack entry to stock and userbases they wish to see extra of. Due to historic knowledge, advertisers are handled unequally by default.

Alternatively, in-app bidding provides everybody an alternative to achieve the viewers they need to attain.

On this mannequin, all advertisers get an opportunity to reply with a bid for any advert request. In consequence, they acquire entry to all the publishers’ stock. Therefore, they’ll attain all the customers that eat it.

After all, so long as they’re prepared to pay for it.

Extra Transparency 

In-app advertisers need to have a transparent understanding of their present and future prospects. They need to have the ability to estimate, predict, and scale their person attain.

With waterfall bidding, that is fairly tough. This mannequin may be very variable, which makes it laborious to make exact predictions.

In-app bidding, however, is rather more clear.

Since all advertisers get equal entry to stock, in addition they get increased visibility of accessible stock and audiences. In keeping with their marketing campaign targets, they’ll then determine to take a position extra in one thing they consider will work for them.

On this case, their selections aren’t random and primarily based on guesswork.

As a substitute, they’ll make knowledgeable, data-driven selections.